<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Very Brief WWDC Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2008/06/09/very-brief-wwdc-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2008/06/09/very-brief-wwdc-thoughts/</link>
	<description>My personal site and blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huw Leslie</title>
		<link>http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/2008/06/09/very-brief-wwdc-thoughts/#comment-76074</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.upfold.org.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-76074</guid>
		<description>Apple's such a powerful brand, so different rules might apply, but I am sceptical about the $99 price for the Mobile Me. Users don't now expect to pay for email/calendar and we're getting very close to an effective file storage solution for free as well. The premium models of Yahoo and Microsoft's webmail products have, I suspect, broken down in popularity, and even those few services for which users are prepared to pay offer a comprehensive free option as well (cf Flickr). Nevertheless, Apple's brand may just be enough to get lemmings to sign up anyway, and they don't need to get a very big fraction of Gmail's user numbers to be pulling in vast revenue with $99/year. And it helps that the demo looked like a compelling product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s such a powerful brand, so different rules might apply, but I am sceptical about the $99 price for the Mobile Me. Users don&#8217;t now expect to pay for email/calendar and we&#8217;re getting very close to an effective file storage solution for free as well. The premium models of Yahoo and Microsoft&#8217;s webmail products have, I suspect, broken down in popularity, and even those few services for which users are prepared to pay offer a comprehensive free option as well (cf Flickr). Nevertheless, Apple&#8217;s brand may just be enough to get lemmings to sign up anyway, and they don&#8217;t need to get a very big fraction of Gmail&#8217;s user numbers to be pulling in vast revenue with $99/year. And it helps that the demo looked like a compelling product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
